[the-old-coach]

Travis– Really enjoyed that song. It has sort of a “happy” sound, with the nice harmonies. Fun to listen to. Thanks for sharing.

[the-old-coach]

mike–

There is a LOT of info in FBW. There’s are lots of “nuts and bolts” things in there, but also a lot of “concept” stuff…..Big stuff…… Hard to put into words here- I hope you can see through my crummy explanation and understand what I mean.

And while I’m not gonna disagree with the people who designed it…. (as far as the 4-week plan for completing FBW)….. My question is…… Why?

My simple advice is— take your time with FBW. Your brain can only absorb soooo much over a certain time-frame. There’s a LOT in there. Go slow; understand it….. as you go along.

I think it’d be fine to stick with the regular Daily Challenges as you go thru FBW– as long as you give your brain the time it needs to absorb everything.

And then, as others have said before……. go thru FBW again…….. and then…… again. Every time you go back thru, you will “see” something new.

My two-cents…..

[the-old-coach]

Remember—- you OWN it. It’s kinda within TAC, but also “kinda separate”. So, even if you were to ever give up your TAC membership– you will still own and have access to Fretboard Wizard. Now…… IMHO, go for it. You won’t regret it, you will learn a LOT!

[the-old-coach]

Also— don’t forget— You OWN it. Even if, for some reason you ever leave TAC, you can still access it. Like others have said— just because you go thru it once, doesn’t mean you’ve “learned it”. Every time you go BACK thru it, you will learn new things…. every time.

[the-old-coach]

jnerney–

Please don’t read my post here and think that I am tryin’ to be some know-it-all– that’s certainly not my intention. I have been exactly where you are and know exactly how you’re feeling.

I was in TAC for 3 years, am no longer a member, but I somehow still have access to this TAC Forum– (which I still LOVE, by the way). What caught my eye about your post is your disappointment with TAC “not teaching you to play a song”. Please try to remember this– try NOT to focus on short-term, instant-gratification things like “learning to play a song”. I believe that TAC’s overall plan for you is NOT to be able “to play a song”, but rather, over time- (and it DOES take time)- be able to play ANY song. Looking at it THAT way- (and- again– putting in the time and effort, just being patient within yourself, and trusting the process)- it’s easy to see which direction to follow, that will give you the best overall outcome……. over time. I think TAC’s philosophy is to build within you a solid foundation of OVERALL skills– with which you can go whatever way you want- (we are ALL different and have different skill-levels entering TAC, and also different “end-goals”……. there is no “one-size-fits-all”.

Consider this: fast-forward a full year…… Would you rather have “learned” maybe a half-dozen old songs- (pretty cool……. for about a week)……… or would you rather have built a solid base of SKILLS from which you can build on— whatever direction you choose. (spoiler alert— playing ANY song will become MUCH easier in the process).

So be patient with yourself and just enjoy the ride. Along the way– in ADDITION to your TAC-learning– remember that there are PLENTY of youtube videos that’ll teach you to play ANY song you want to learn. (my faves are Marty Schwartz and Justin Sandercoe).

If you focus on just learning a song— you are giving-up actually learning guitar.

theoldcoach

[the-old-coach]

Hello– Barb. This is a great thread– and you have had GREAT responses so far– (prior to this comment of mine!).

OK– When you mention “Licks and single note-playing” are you referring to spicing-up that moment or so BETWEEN chords, or, maybe, playing “walk-downs” or “walk-ups”(?)— or are you talking about entire instrumental lines within a song- (like “mini-solos”)?

Specifically “when” and “how” you are trying to use these licks and single notes is important…. Including: if it’s when you are just noodling-around, or if it’s when you’re just practicing transitions from one chord to the next, or if it’s when you’re trying to play-along with a song, or even if it’s when you are writing tunes on your own…. on and on….

I have some ideas and possible suggestions, depending on your specific use.

First things first: Be cool. Even if you think you aren’t improving….. you ARE. Take this issue in small chunks of time. NOT hours-long beat-downs. Just 10 minutes or so, then come back to it later….. or tomorrow….. Your brain needs time to soak it in.

[the-old-coach]

Great thread! Fun to read.

My own goals are to go back thru the 20-or-so songs I’ve written and posted either in here or JMG, and re-do them— using knowledge I’ve gained in the last couple years. Plus, FINISH the at-least-that-many-again, that are “in progress”). Then, I hope to whittle them down to 20, then 10, then have some kind of a “favorite 5”, or similar, that I can play at VOM’s or maybe even an open mic somewhere- IF somehow I can get up the nerve!).

It’s a tall order for me, but I’m optomistic- (maybe…..).

• This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by  the-old-coach.

[the-old-coach]

jbrod–

Look up Marty Schwartz….. maybe also Angela Petrelli…..

• This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by  the-old-coach.

[the-old-coach]

I’ll give it another listen, imagining it without the harmonies!

[the-old-coach]

Yeah, I don’t really understand the “sale” pricing….. at all. It’s not like it– only on occasion– takes them any longer or shorter time to manufacture a copy of it.

Separate note– It would be great if there was a “free trial/sneak-peek” thing…… (maybe there is).

[the-old-coach]

Oh, yeah……. LOVE that song.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.

[the-old-coach]

Sorry, Dennis- got carried away also. You have started a good thread here.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.
• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.

[the-old-coach]

Jeff– once again– you have delivered the perfect response and guidance.

Dennis– Forget about “needing” to be so all-exact in your practice time– and the subject matter of each practice. Don’t worry about that stuff. IMHO– just “go with the flow” of the TAC philosophy. This is what you are paying-for as a member in TAC. You’re paying for all the planning to be done for you, so the burden of all that thinking-about “what you should work on next” and all the self-expectation is off your shoulders. Just keep playing every day, remember that learning guitar is not “required-reading” in life—– and that it is a s-l-o-w process. And never forget that you started this journey with the intent of having fun with it.

Over time, learning all these various things- (that may be seemingly impossible now)- will almost happen “on auto-pilot”.

When I was first in my power-lineman apprenticeship training (mid 1980’s)- boy was I ever “full of p*ss and vinegar”. I wanted it ALL……. NOW. That was a big mistake. You need time to fully understand something new. I was told by an old-timer lineman that I should stop “trying to make things happen– and just let things happen”. What a difference that made! I also realized right then that there was a huge difference between learning something, and actually understanding it.

Yeah- the whole “practice-time” (and content) is a very vague thing if you try to figure it all out yourself. But, that’s why you are a member in TAC. You have enough on your mind in learning– let them do the heavy-lifting as far as planning-out everything.

(Disclaimer– offering completely-un-asked-for opinions is just another service I offer free of charge!)

theoldcoach

• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.
• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.

[the-old-coach]

Jeff– I kind-of feel a bit sorry for you, now knowing that “our minds think alike”.

I want to re-join TAC, but it is a bit of a financial burden for me nowadays. I really LOVED the structured/ yet positive overall theme of the TAC philosophy. And….. it WORKS….. and works GOOD.

And it is always great to hear from you. You have pulled me out of the weeds several times over the years.

yer pal-

the old coach

• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.
• This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  the-old-coach.

[the-old-coach]

If I may, can I mention something that was told to me a long time ago, by a guy who played (mostly “rhythm-guitar”) in local bands for years.

I use it, it makes transitions much easier, and sounds cool in the process. It simply involves adding, changing, or removing one finger off the chord you are going “from”– on your way to the chord you are going “to”. Sounds confusing– but it is soooo easy.

Here’s an example– you are transitioning from a C chord- (using the “normal” open shape)- to a G chord- (again- “normal shape”).

Take your C, and– (sort of “on your way” to G)- simply drop your pinkie (that’s unused in the C), onto the 3rd fret of the Hi-E, and take a strum there. Think of it as “kind-of a bridge” / kind-of a “chord-in-between-chords” on your way from C to G– (kind of a “half C/ half G”).

And… your pinkie is already “there” as you finish moving to the G.

Think of this as a “general concept” that can be used on LOTS of transitions from any chord to any chord. (You can also “LIFT” a pinkie or an index finger– gives you LOTS of cool-sounding transitions).

Another suggestion as you change from chord to chord is to use “sus2″s and “sus4″s in the same manner I mentioned here. They are COOL!

You can also just use this just playing 2-3 strings- (sort of a “mini-chord”)- or even just pick ONE string in the transition.

Just maybe experiment/noodle around with this idea a little. Let me know if it works or even makes sense for you.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by  the-old-coach.